I don’t understand it. And, I don’t know if there is anything afoot to change it, but as I’m sure you’ve no doubt noticed if you’ve ever moused over the stars on Amazon and Goodreads–there is a difference in the star ratings between the two. Are you one who thinks the star rating is equivalent to personal perception? Or have you read and understood the star definitions of both? I’ve run up against this before, debating what to do; set my star ratings the same on both websites–or change to more closely indicate my objective opinion on each.
A Goodreads five star indicates you thought the book “amazing.” I don’t consider that the same as, “I love it.” So what is the difference between the two? Note the graphic above.
1 Did not like it
2 It was okay
3 I liked it
4 I really liked it
5 It was amazing
1 I hate it
2 I don’t like it
3 It’s okay
4 I like it
5 I love it
Really, neither of the two asks your opinion regarding the plotting, characterization, grammar, or level of typos. It’s a matter of how much you liked the book. Perhaps that makes sense considering the reading levels of the average reader.
Does the average reviewer actually use the website assigned stars or simply judge based on the use of their own system?
In a 2015 study by McGill University, it was found that Amazon has higher average ratings compared to Goodreads and Goodreads users gave four stars more often than Amazon users (36.26%). That translation bears exactly how I would interpret the meaning behind the stars of those two websites as well. How many times does a conscientious book reviewer look for a compromise and assign a half point–4.5 stars, but are then forced to round up or down–well, THAT’s subjective then, not objective!
They maintain, therefore, that the Goodreads ratings fall in the range of 3 to 4 stars while Amazon falls between 4 and 5 stars. Their argument extends to a higher average for some genres (i.e., biographies) on Amazon than are found on Goodreads. Makes sense if you consider Goodreads basically shifts one point lower, making only one a negative, one a neutral, and three more positive. That makes your four star rating on Goodreads equivalent to Amazon five.
Their additional argument extends further in the propensity of Amazon reviewers to help “sell” the book, whereon Goodreads tends to more journalistic attributes, concentrating on the book’s content.
Also surprising, the study found that Amazon reviews tends to be a greater length, which flies in the face of that which I was taught–keep it short on Amazon–expand on the description in Goodreads–and just have fun with it on your own website. Indeed, I’ve been asked to keep my reviews short on Amazon to allow for more reviews on the landing page.
Kristen Twardowski in her recent WordPress post, “What to do with Goodreads,” says “Goodreads is the largest book review website on the internet.” She goes on to cite April 2017 statistics that show over 55 million members wrote an astounding 50 million reviews. (And you thought your book was being buried on Amazon!) A quick search on Amazon shows print title totals all over the page (although if we use Amazon best sellers rank numbers, there are over 13 million)–there is also 800,000 ebook titles.
Amazon gobbled up Goodreads in March 2013. There have been a number of arguments regarding the star ratings disparity since then. Wikipedia noted, “Some authors, however, believe the purchase means that the “best place to discuss books is joining up with the best place to buy books.”
The updates to the Kindle app requesting a star rating at the end of the book you are rating begs an additional argument. If you hit the star rating link without consideration of the rating definition differences and the site links to Amazon as well as Goodreads, in my mind, the ratings become skewed.
I like the breakdown that Greg Zimmerman showed on his blog post appearing in June 2011 in which he whittled it down further: 4 and 5 stars==liked it, 3 stars=neutral, and 1 and 2 stars=didn’t like it. He then compares Amazon stats to Goodreads stats and in the end concluded good reason for Goodreads reviews. There continues to be skepticism for Amazon reviews on many of the forums, which agrees with my own perception and I posted here. Two of my favorite reads this year (reviewed on this blog) with 15 or more ratings in GR’s also reflect McGill’s consensus.
Amazon – 15 ratings (average 4.7) 94% 4 stars or better
Goodreads – 24 ratings (average 4.0) 80% 4 stars or better
Amazon – 268 ratings (average 4.7) – 94% 4 stars or better
Goodreads – 616 ratings (average 4.29) 86% 4 stars or better
There is a credibility with Goodreads reviews. As a reader, have you performed review searches on Goodreads? Did you find they closely followed your own opinions? Do you compare the two? Judging by the number of review requests I receive, it would appear authors are still seeking strong Amazon authentication. I get it–lots of five stars on your Amazon book helps to spread the word (not so much the algorithm, which is based on sales), but I hope you feel good about your Goodreads reviews. Do you have another large book reviewer website out there? I’d like to hear about it! ©2017 Virginia Williams